There are almost as many variations of the different pricing
models as there are companies on the web. Everyone is trying to figure out
what’s the best model out there in order to maximize either conversion, traffic
or whatever they’re trying to do. In my previous post “To charge or not to
charge, that is the question” I explained my take on pricing of online content and
what I see as almost a paradigm shift in how consumer will consume information
and entertainment. Since we haven’t yet entered through the golden gates to
Shangri La, where content is freely available to everyone, I will now cover
different pricing models suited for modern publishers and content producers.
To begin with what I won’t be covering here is the infamous
pay wall model. My personal view is that, even though it might work for highly
specialized publishers with their own niche audiences, it won’t work for 99% of
the companies out there. Not at least as a single source of revenue. If the pay
wall payment can be bundled together with for example my cell phone and cable
bill or if I have the option to specifically choose what I want to pay for,
then there is a change it could work. What the Finnish newspaper Helsingin
Sanomat does very well is that they’ve enabled the customers to choose exactly
what they want to pay for. In addition to receiving the traditional paper
newspaper, customers can choose to add the iPad and mobile versions of the
magazine to the order. They can also choose on which days they wish to receive
all this. So for instance for a busy future business man like me, the iPad and
mobile versions of the magazine might be enough from Monday to Thursday but I
could still have the paper magazine on Friday, Saturday and Sunday when I have
time to read.
During a time when publishers are becoming service providers
and service providers are more and more becoming publishers, the
differentiation into black and white is difficult and so is finding the best
possible pricing model. Different ways publishers can approach this problem is
by experimenting. If revenue from advertising isn’t enough, they shouldn’t
isolate themselves from the web behind a pay wall, but they should develop new
sources of revenue. Adding different services that meet the needs of different
niche markets into an existing business model is one way to go. Examples of
this can be found from the Daily Mirror’s MirrorFootball.co.uk, which provides
highly detailed information about football in the UK and around the world. The
page takes the sport’s section on the Daily Mirror site further by offering
users more content and a change to bet on games. Until the industry standards
and clearer game rules are established, the best bet for successful pricing
should be a mix of little bit of everything.
No comments:
Post a Comment